<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>&#160;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leifgrunseth.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leifgrunseth.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Extreme Mercury Toxicity Sidelines Actor Jeremy Piven</title>
		<link>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/extreme-mercury-toxicity-sidelines-actor-jeremy-piven/</link>
		<comments>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/extreme-mercury-toxicity-sidelines-actor-jeremy-piven/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Dental Problems]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fish/Seafood]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mercury]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vaccinations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leifgrunseth.com/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Dr. Mercola&#8217;s Comments:


This announcement comes just weeks after the U.S. FDA began arguing that pregnant women should eat more fish, even if it contains mercury! Although no definitive link has proven that Jeremy Piven&#8217;s twice-a-day sushi habit is what caused his excessively high mercury levels, common sense would indicate that there is likely a connection.
Recent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><a name="drcomment">Dr. Mercola&#8217;s Comments:</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">This announcement comes just weeks after the U.S. FDA began arguing that pregnant women should eat more fish, <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/01/03/fda-tells-pregnant-women-it-s-ok-to-consume-mercury.aspx">even if it contains mercury</a>! Although no definitive link has proven that Jeremy Piven&#8217;s twice-a-day sushi habit is what caused his excessively high mercury levels, common sense would indicate that there is likely a connection.</p>
<p>Recent testing of sushi bars show that sushi does often appear to be contaminated with mercury, and in some cases worse so than other fish.  Laboratory tests in New York released last year found so much mercury in tuna sushi that two or three pieces a week at some restaurants could be a health hazard.</p>
<p>In fact, eight out of the 44 pieces of sushi purchased by the New York Times for testing had <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/2/14/hazardous-levels-of-mercury-in-sushi.aspx">mercury levels so high</a> that the FDA could take legal action to remove the fish from the market. And the problem is certainly not isolated to New York.</p>
<p>When sushi samples from 10 high-rated Chicago sushi restaurants were tested it was found that:<span id="more-580"></span>70 percent exceeded the Illinois Environmental Protection agency&#8217;s (IEPA) special advisory threshold for methylmercury. At that level, women of childbearing age and children are advised to eat no more than one serving per month</p>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li>14 percent had a concentration higher than 0.730 ppm &#8212; a level that no women or children should ever consume</li>
</ul>
<p>• 10 percent of the tuna samples were unsafe for all consumers, because they contained mercury levels above 1.0 ppm, which is the legal action limit for fish sold in the U.S.The dangers of consuming too much mercury are often focused on children and pregnant women because of the known damage it can pose to a baby&#8217;s developing central nervous system. However, as Jeremy Piven would surely attest to, too much mercury is dangerous for adults too.<br />
<strong><br />
The Risks of Mercury Poisoning</strong></p>
<p>Thousands of tons of mercury are released into the air each year through pollution and waste. In the environment the mercury can transform into organic mercury, which is known as methylmercury, and accumulate in streams, oceans, water and soil.</p>
<p>Methylmercury also accumulates in the food chain, so each fish absorbs the mercury in other fish and organisms it eats. For this reason, larger and older fish such as shark, tuna and swordfish contain the highest levels of methylmercury.</p>
<p>People who regularly eat fish have higher levels of methylmercury than those who don&#8217;t, which is concerning, considering that methylmercury toxicity can result in paraesthesia (a tingling sensation on your skin), depression, and blurred vision.</p>
<p>In fetuses and developing infants it can also have negative effects on attention span, language, visual-spatial skills, memory and coordination. It is estimated that nearly 60,000 children each year are born at risk for neurological problems due to methylmercury exposure in the womb.</p>
<p>Mercury is especially damaging to your central nervous system (CNS), and studies show that mercury in the CNS causes psychological, neurological, and immunological problems including:</p>
<p> </p>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li>Arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies</li>
<li>Tremors</li>
<li>Insomnia</li>
<li>Personality changes and irritability</li>
<li>Headaches</li>
</ul>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li>Weakness</li>
<li>Blurred vision</li>
<li>Slowed mental response</li>
</ul>
<p>• Unsteady gait To make matters worse, mercury bonds very firmly to structures in your CNS. Unless actively removed, mercury has an extremely long half-life of somewhere between 15 and 30 years in the CNS!</p>
<p><strong>Fish is Not the Only Source of Mercury</strong></p>
<p>Eating fish frequently is one way to elevate your mercury levels, but it is not the only one. <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/07/06/mercury-in-your-teeth-you-need-to-watch-this-video.aspx">Silver dental fillings</a> (amalgams) are another major contributor.</p>
<p>Amalgams are made up of 50 percent mercury. More than 100 million mercury fillings are placed each year in the United States, as over 90 percent of dentists use them for restoring posterior teeth.</p>
<p>The average individual has eight amalgam fillings and could absorb up to 120 micrograms of mercury per day from their amalgams. For comparison, estimates of the daily absorption of all forms of mercury from fish and seafood is 2.3 micrograms and from all other foods, air and water is 0.3 micrograms per day.</p>
<p>Adults with four or more amalgams run a significant risk of mercury-related health problems from them, while in children as few as two amalgams will contribute to health problems.</p>
<p>In most children, meanwhile, the largest source of mercury is that <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/03/15/why-do-drugmakers-still-defend-the-use-of-mercury-in-their-vaccines.aspx">received from vaccinations</a> or that transferred to them in utero from their mother.<br />
<strong><br />
Steps to Remove Mercury from Your Body</strong></p>
<p>First of all, you should reduce your exposure to additional mercury as much as possible by:</p>
<p> </p>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li>Avoiding fish (unless it has been lab-tested and found to be free of harmful levels of mercury)</li>
<li>Not having anymore silver fillings put in (if you need a filling, see a biological dentist who uses mercury-free materials)</li>
<li>Avoiding vaccinations that contain mercury, such as <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/11/18/do-flu-shots-work-ask-a-vaccine-manufacturer.aspx">flu shots </a></li>
</ul>
<p>• Making sure any herbal remedies you&#8217;re taking are from a reputable source with strict quality testing (some low-quality remedies can be <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/02/09/some-folk-medicines-contain-lead.aspx">high in mercury and other toxic metals</a>) Next, I recommend that you have any existing amalgam fillings removed &#8230; but avoid making the mistake I did 20 years ago by having it done by a non-biological dentist. I&#8217;d say only about 5 percent of dentists know how to remove these fillings safely, so do your research and seek out a highly qualified biological dentist.</p>
<p>You see, when you have these fillings removed you can be exposed to significant amounts of mercury vapors if the dentist doesn&#8217;t know what he or she is doing.</p>
<p>My mercury exposure from having this done improperly nearly caused me to lose both my kidneys and go on dialysis. For this reason, I suggest you <a href="http://www.mercola.com/nutritionplan/index.htm">get healthy BEFORE having your fillings removed</a>, as you want your detoxification mechanisms optimized prior to removal.</p>
<p>To remove mercury that has already accumulated in your body, I highly recommend reviewing my <a href="http://www.mercola.com/article/mercury/index.htm">Mercury Detoxification Protocol</a>, which details the things you can do right now to help detoxify your body of this toxic substance. If your mercury levels are seriously elevated, you should work with a knowledgeable health care practitioner to help you through the detoxification process.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Related Articles:</strong></p>
<p>  <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2005/02/23/mercury-fish-part-ten.aspx">Eat Fish Often? Calculate Your Mercury Risk Now</a></p>
<p> <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/07/22/toxic-metals-the-reason-you-still-feel-sick.aspx">Toxic Metals: The Reason You Still Feel Sick</a></p>
<p> <a href="http://www.mercola.com/article/mercury/mercury_elimination.htm">Mercury Toxicity and Systemic Elimination Agents</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/extreme-mercury-toxicity-sidelines-actor-jeremy-piven/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mammograms: Outmoded Ideas of Cancer  Detection and Treatment</title>
		<link>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/mammograms-outmoded-ideas-of-cancer-detection-and-treatment/</link>
		<comments>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/mammograms-outmoded-ideas-of-cancer-detection-and-treatment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leifgrunseth.com/?p=576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most devastating loss of life from breast cancer occurs between the ages of 30 to 50. Fortunately, you have more options available to you today to help detect breast cancer than in the past decades.  Unfortunately, education and awareness of these options and their effectiveness in detecting breast cancer at different stages in life [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most devastating loss of life from breast cancer occurs between the ages of 30 to 50. Fortunately, you have more options available to you today to help detect breast cancer than in the past decades.  Unfortunately, education and awareness of these options and their effectiveness in detecting breast cancer at different stages in life are woefully deficient.</p>
<p><strong>Beyond Mammography</strong></p>
<p>In the first part of the in-depth article linked below, <em>Beyond Mammography</em>, Dr. Len Saputo explores the latest findings on the effectiveness and shortcomings of various detection methods used by the mainstream medical community, including mammography, clinical breast exams, ultrasound, and to a lesser extent, magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) and PET scans.</p>
<p>The second part goes beyond mammography, exploring a highly advanced but much maligned detection tool for breast cancer &#8212; breast thermography.<span id="more-576"></span></p>
<p>Breast thermography, which involves using a heat-sensing scanner to detect variations in the temperature of breast tissue, has been around since the 1960s. However, early infrared scanners were not very sensitive, and were insufficiently tested before being put into clinical practice, resulting in misdiagnosed cases.</p>
<p>Modern-day breast thermography boasts vastly improved technology and more extensive scientific clinical research. In fact, the article references data from major peer review journals and research on more than 300,000 women who have been tested using the technology. Combined with the successes in detecting breast cancer with greater accuracy than other methods, the technology is slowly gaining ground among more progressive practitioners.</p>
<p><strong>About the Author</strong></p>
<p>Dr. Len Saputo, MD, is a graduate of Duke University Medical School, and is the Founder and Director of the Health Medicine Forum, which has hosted and moderated over 350 events. He&#8217;s also the Co-founder and Medical Director of the Health Medicine Institute and Health Medicine Center, and runs a private practice in Internal Medicine and Health Medicine.</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><a href="http://mercola.fileburst.com/PDF/Beyond.Mammography.pdf" target="_blank">Beyond Mammography (pdf)</a></li>
</ul>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><a name="drcomment">Dr. Mercola&#8217;s Comments:</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Breast cancer is the second most deadly form of cancer for women in the U.S. Only lung cancer claims more women&#8217;s lives than breast cancer. </p>
<p>According to Cancer.org&#8217;s latest report, <a href="http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/BCFF-Final.pdf">Breast Cancer Facts &amp; Figures 2007-2008</a>, 2007 ushered in more than 178,000 new cases of invasive breast cancer, and more than 40,000 women died from the disease.  </p>
<p>But <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/06/12/male-breast-cancer.aspx">men are by no means immune to breast cancer</a>. Just over 2,000 men were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2007, and approximately 450 men died. Since routine screening for men is next to nonexistent, men are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced disease, and therefore <a href="http://v.mercola.com/blogs/public_blog/male-breast-cancer-patients-may-face-greater-risks-of-cancer-returning-4960.aspx">have poorer chances for survival</a>. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, conventional medicine is stubbornly holding on to outmoded ideas of cancer detection and treatment, no matter how ineffective it&#8217;s been proven to be.  </p>
<p>Mammography is a perfect example of this stubborn head-in-the-sand approach to cancer screening. </p>
<p>Education and awareness of better, less risky and more effective options for detecting breast cancer are woefully deficient, but they do exist, and it is my hope you will take the time to review this important information, whether you&#8217;re a man or a woman, and forward it widely to your family and friends. <strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>The Case Against Mammography</strong></p>
<p>Health officials recommend that all women over 40 get a mammogram every one to two years, yet there is no solid evidence that mammograms save lives, and the benefits of mammograms are controversial at best.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the health hazards of mammography have been well established.</p>
<p>John Gofman, M.D., Ph.D. - a nuclear physicist and a medical doctor, and one of the leading experts in the world on the dangers of radiation - presents compelling evidence in his book, <em>Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease,</em> that over <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/04/07/x-ray-part-one.aspx">50 percent of the death-rate from cancer is in fact <em>induced</em> by x-rays</a>. </p>
<p>Now consider the fact that the routine practice of taking four films of each breast annually results in approximately 1 rad (radiation absorbed dose) exposure, which is about <strong>1,000 times greater than that from a chest x-ray</strong>.</p>
<p>Even the American Cancer Society lists high-dose radiation to the chest as a medium to high risk factor for developing cancer.<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong></p>
<p>How Mammography Increases Your Cancer Risk</strong></p>
<p>X-rays and other classes of ionizing radiation have been, for decades, a proven cause of virtually all types of biological mutations.<strong> </strong>When such mutations are not cell-lethal, they endure and accumulate with each additional exposure to x-rays or other ionizing radiation.</p>
<p>X-rays are also an established cause of genomic instability, often a characteristic of the most aggressive cancers.</p>
<p>Additionally, radiation risks are about four times greater for the 1 to 2 percent of women who are silent carriers of the A-T (ataxia-telangiectasia) gene, which by some estimates accounts for up to 20 percent of all breast cancers diagnosed annually.</p>
<p>When everything is taken into account, <strong>reducing exposure to medical radiation such as unnecessary mammograms would actually likely reduce mortality rates.</strong></p>
<p>The practice of screening mammography itself poses significant and cumulative risks of breast cancer, especially for premenopausal women.</p>
<p>Making matters even worse, false positive diagnoses are very common - as high as 89 percent - leading many women to be unnecessarily and harmfully treated by mastectomy, more radiation, or chemotherapy.</p>
<p>There are instances where mammography may be warranted. But the fact remains that there are other technologies that are proven to be more effective, less expensive, and completely harmless, that can save far more lives.</p>
<p>Now, imagine being able to look inside yourself and be able to get as much as 10 years warning that something is <em>about</em> to develop, giving you ample time to PREVENT the cancer from forming in the first place by taking the appropriate lifestyle changes that can radically change your health.</p>
<p>That technology already exists, and has been available since the 1960s.</p>
<p><strong>Thermographic Breast Screening - A Safer, More Effective Alternative</strong></p>
<p>Most physicians continue to recommend mammograms for fear of being sued by a woman who develops breast cancer after he did not advise her to get one. But I encourage you to think for yourself and consider safer, more effective alternatives to mammograms.</p>
<p>The option for breast screening that I most highly recommend is called <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2000/10/29/thermography.aspx">thermographic breast screening</a>.  </p>
<p>Thermographic screening is brilliantly simple. It measures the radiation of infrared heat from your body and translates this information into anatomical images. Your normal blood circulation is under the control of your autonomic nervous system, which governs your body functions.<br />
<strong><br />
Thermography uses no mechanical pressure or ionizing radiation, and can detect signs of breast cancer as much as 10 years earlier than either mammography or a physical exam!</strong> </p>
<p>Whereas mammography cannot detect a tumor until after it has been growing for years and reaches a certain size, thermography is able to detect the possibility of breast cancer much earlier.  </p>
<p>It can even detect the potential for cancer <em>before</em> any tumors have formed because it can image the early stages of angiogenesis &#8212; the formation of a direct supply of blood to cancer cells, which is a necessary step before they can grow into tumors of size.</p>
<p>More men&#8217;s lives could also be spared from the disease as mammography is not frequently used on men, which leads to most men with breast cancer being diagnosed at a very late stage.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://naturalhealthcenter.mercola.com/services/thermography.aspx"><strong>Visit Dr. Mercola&#8217;s Thermography Diagnostics Center NOW</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Other Risk Factors Commonly Ignored and How You Can Avoid Them</strong></p>
<p>Breast density and high levels of circulating sex hormones are two commonly known risk factors for breast cancer in post menopausal women. A 2007 <a href="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/99/15/1178">study published in the <em>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</em></a> confirmed that although the two factors commonly occur together, they are also independent risk factors.</p>
<p>They found that (after controlling for other factors) when breast density was not considered, women with high amounts of circulating sex hormones had twice the risk of developing breast cancer as those with low amounts. And, women in the highest one-quarter in density had four times the risk of those in the lowest quarter, without considering levels of sex hormones.</p>
<p>Women with both the highest hormones and densest breasts had up to six times the risk.</p>
<p>The authors of the study highlighted the importance of screening and, perhaps most importantly, maintaining a healthy, lower weight to help keep hormone levels lower. In fact, excess body weight and <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/05/07/obesity-cancer-part-two.aspx">obesity plays a significant role in a number of cancer deaths</a>, admits the American Cancer Society.</p>
<p>But there are other factors that will increase your risk of breast cancer that few ever bother to mention.</p>
<p>For example, a 2001 <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/10/13/vitamin-d-part-three.aspx">study published in the <em>British Journal of Cancer</em></a> discovered that women with breast cancer are twice as likely to have a fault in the gene required to make use of vitamin D. The research suggested that women with genetic variations (polymorphisms) of the vitamin D receptor gene may be less able to benefit from this protective effect.</p>
<p>Experts already believe vitamin D protects against breast cancer and in some forms may even be used to shrink existing tumors. According to recent <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/11/06/sunbathing-cuts-breast-cancer-risk-in-half.aspx">research from Stanford University</a>, optimal amounts of sunlight exposure may reduce your risk of advanced breast cancer by as much as 50 percent.</p>
<p>I believe sunlight is so imperative for disease prevention and for your overall health I even wrote a book on the topic called <em>Dark Deception</em>, which is due out shortly.</p>
<p>Your omega-3 to omega-6 ratio can also play a significant role.</p>
<p>One study, published in the <em><a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2002/03/23/omega3-part-two.aspx">International Journal of Cancer in 2002</a></em>, discovered that omega-3 fatty acids did indeed have a protective effect against breast cancer. This supports the imperative balance of your omega-3 to omega-6 ratio as being important in the development of breast cancer in the first place. This is just one of the many reasons why I recommend taking a high quality <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/08/14/is-krill-oil-48-times-better-than-fish-oil.aspx">omega-3 supplement in the form of krill oil</a>, which I have found to be the most effective and beneficial, compared to fish oil.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Related Articles:</strong></p>
<p>  <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/08/07/major-confusion-on-how-to-do-breast-checks.aspx">Major Confusion on How to Do Breast Checks</a></p>
<p> <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/12/13/your-immune-system-can-keep-cancer-dormant.aspx">Your Immune System Can Keep Cancer Dormant</a></p>
<p> <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2002/06/12/cancer-part-three.aspx">How You Can Beat Prostate and Breast Cancer Nutritionally</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/mammograms-outmoded-ideas-of-cancer-detection-and-treatment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MS Miracle</title>
		<link>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/ms-miracle/</link>
		<comments>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/ms-miracle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leifgrunseth.com/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q: My wife has been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Is there any natural cure for this disease?
Dr. Wright: Unfortunately, there is no cure for multiple sclerosis (MS). But calcium aminoethylphosphate (CaEAP) is one of the few substances that cause clinical improvements in the majority of people who have MS. CaEAP works by protecting the integrity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q: My wife has been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Is there any natural cure for this disease?</p>
<p>Dr. Wright: Unfortunately, there is no cure for multiple sclerosis (MS). But calcium aminoethylphosphate (CaEAP) is one of the few substances that cause clinical improvements in the majority of people who have MS. CaEAP works by protecting the integrity of cell membranes, sealing them off from autoimmune complexes but still permitting nutrients to enter. It also improves the absorption of its associated minerals and &#8220;targets&#8221; more of those minerals to specific locations within each cell. <span id="more-574"></span><br />
When Nutrition &amp; Healing devoted the entire October 1999 issue to multiple sclerosis, with a follow-up statistical report in December 1999, the nice folks at Brewer Science Library (the repository for Dr. Nieper&#8217;s collected writings) reminded us of their annual survey concerning intravenous calcium EAP and multiple sclerosis.</p>
<p>According to a survey conducted by the Brewer Science Library, of 293 individuals who tried intravenous calcium EAP, 235 noticed improvement on an average of 13 out of the 36 possible symptoms listed on the survey. As to the most often improved symptoms, 162 experienced less numbness, 142 felt less fatigue, 130 experienced an improvement in balance, and 119 reported greater ease in walking.</p>
<p>Overall, 71 percent of those surveyed rated themselves as being &#8220;stabilized&#8221; or &#8220;mildly to markedly&#8221; improved.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in learning more about this therapy, it&#8217;s a good idea to consult a physician skilled in natural medicine. To find one near you, contact the American College for Advancement in Medicine at (800)532-3688 or visit www.acam.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/ms-miracle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only One Chromium Supplement Helps People with Diabetes</title>
		<link>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/only-one-chromium-supplement-helps-people-with-diabetes/</link>
		<comments>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/only-one-chromium-supplement-helps-people-with-diabetes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vitamins/Minerals/Nutrients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leifgrunseth.com/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friday, December 05, 2008 by: Dr. Phil Domenico            http://www.naturalnews.com/025006.html
(NaturalNews) Chromium is an essential mineral in humans that helps the hormone insulin function properly. When insulin is functioning well, blood sugar is balanced. The job of insulin is to remove sugar from the bloodstream and to transport it to the tissues for energy. When insulin is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friday, December 05, 2008 by: Dr. Phil Domenico            http://www.naturalnews.com/025006.html</p>
<p>(NaturalNews) Chromium is an essential mineral in humans that helps the hormone insulin function properly. When insulin is functioning well, blood sugar is balanced. The job of insulin is to remove sugar from the bloodstream and to transport it to the tissues for energy. When insulin is malfunctioning, as in diabetes or obesity, high blood sugar can cause damage to the arteries to set the stage for cardiovascular disease. Also, insufficient sugar transport starves the tissues, which promotes hunger. That&#8217;s why obese people eat constantly and still feel hungry. Chromium is not the only nutrient that supports blood sugar and insulin health, but it can make a substantial difference.<span id="more-570"></span></p>
<p>It turns out that the form of chromium makes a big difference as well. A recent study reported that Niacin-bound chromium (Cr-N) provides significantly more heart health benefits than chromium picolinate (Cr-P) in diabetic rats. &#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this study is misleading in a variety of ways. The scientists involved have been going out of their way for years to try to make Cr-N competitive with Cr-P. They continue to perform dubious studies in animals and in test tubes to show that Cr-N is better than Cr-P. They used a massive dose of chromium in the above study, perhaps to ensure that Cr-N would work. Normal, effective Cr-P doses are close to 50 times smaller. In fact, it may be the high levels of niacin (vitamin B3) in this rat study that reduced inflammatory markers, not the chromium. Furthermore, the quality of Cr-P used by these researchers in this and other studies is suspect. One wonders if these researchers have a vested interest in the commercial success of this Cr-N supplement.</p>
<p>Massive Cr-N doses may be compelling in the lab, but they do not hold water when given to people. In contrast, Cr-P is the supplement of choice in humans. It is the only chromium awarded a qualified health claim from the FDA. It is the chief chromium supplement in numerous studies currently being funded by the National Institutes of Health. And, it is the only one that works unequivocally in humans, particularly for people with sugar problems.</p>
<p>Indeed, all 15 trials using Cr-P for people with diabetes have demonstrated beneficial effects. Fourteen of those 15 clinical studies (including 11 randomized, controlled studies) involving a total of 1,696 subjects reported significant improvement in blood sugar control. All 15 studies showed salutary effects in at least one aspect of diabetes management, including improvements in blood fats. Positive outcomes from Cr-P supplementation included reduced blood sugar, insulin, cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and reduced requirements for diabetes medication. Substantial reductions in these parameters equates to a reduced risk for disease complications (Broadhurst &amp; Domenico, 2006).</p>
<p>Chromium picolinate supplementation also provides benefits for healthy people. A recent study showed significant reduction in hunger levels by 24%, food intake by 25%, and reduced cravings for high-fat foods in adult, non-diabetic, overweight women (Anton et al., 2008). In another study, a single dose of Cr-P helped control blood sugar spikes in 2 out of every 3 healthy individuals given large amounts of sugar (Frauchiger et al., 2004). People, who use the glycemic index to lose weight, eat foods high in fiber and low in sugar and starch to help reduce blood sugar spikes. It appears that Cr-P is a useful addition to help improve glycemic control and weight management. Cr-P has also been shown to fight depression and to curb carb cravings, likely by keeping blood sugar at optimal levels (Docherty et al., 2005).</p>
<p>The greater bioavailability (gut absorption) of Cr-P compared to other forms of chromium may explain its superiority in blood sugar control. Picolinate is a natural chelating agent found in breast milk that helps transport minerals from mother to infant. Picolinate holds on to chromium tightly enough to get it through the digestive system intact so as to enable its absorption by the body. Niacin, on the other hand, does not chelate chromium well, and does not support absorption.</p>
<p>Several studies have shown that Cr-P is significantly better absorbed than other chromium forms in animal and human studies (Anderson et al., 2004; DiSilvestro and Dy, 2005). The available data indicate that Cr-N is poorly absorbed. Inorganic forms of chromium, like chromium chloride, have never demonstrated consistent efficacy due to limited intestinal absorption. However, most multivitamins, especially the cheap drugstore type, contain chromium chloride (Again, you get what you pay for). Another chromium complex, chromium histidinate, shows enhanced chromium bioavailability, and is currently being researched and developed (Anderson et al., 2004).</p>
<p>Chromium supplementation is most important for people with diabetes. Many subjects with type 2 diabetes have faulty chromium metabolism, due to inadequate intake, decreased absorption and increased loss. Current data show a strong correlation between diabetes and low levels of chromium in serum, hair, and toenail tissues. For these reasons, chromium supplementation on the order of 1000 mcg per day has been recommended to provide significant clinical benefit in diabetes. The dose for non-diabetic individuals is in the range of 200-500 mcg per day.</p>
<p>Chromium picolinate has also been shown to be safe in humans at the prescribed doses. A recent study showed that Cr-P does not induce toxicity (i.e., chromosomal damage) at doses up to 2000 mg per kilogram of body weight (Komorowski et al., 2008), which is close to 50,000 times the dose recommended for diabetes subjects. The FDA has also recently affirmed Cr-P safety.</p>
<p>No other chromium supplement shows the consistent benefits that Cr-P does, especially at higher doses for subjects with diabetes. Considering its compelling safety profile, Cr-P is an inexpensive and uniquely efficacious supplement to help control the high cost of diabetes treatment. It makes no sense to toy with chromium supplements that have limited research support when the stakes are so high.</p>
<p>References:<br />
Anderson RA, Polansky MM, and Bryden NA. Stability and absorption of chromium and absorption of chromium histidinate complexes by humans. Biol Trace Elem Res 2004;101:211-8.</p>
<p>Anton SD, Morrison CD, Cefalu WT, et al. Effects of Chromium Picolinate on Food Intake and Satiety. Diabetes Technology &amp; Therapeutics 2008;10:405-12.</p>
<p>Broadhurst CL, Domenico P. Clinical studies on chromium picolinate supplementation in diabetes mellitus- A Review. Diabetes Technology &amp; Therapeutics 2006;8:677-87.</p>
<p>DiSilvestro RA and Dy E. Comparison of acute absorption of various types of chromium supplement complexes. FASEB 2005;19:A92-3.</p>
<p>Docherty JP, Sack DA, Roffman M, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory trial of chromium picolinate in atypical depression: Effect on carbohydrate craving. J Psychiat Pract 2005;11:302-14.</p>
<p>Frauchiger MT, Wenk C, Colombani PC. Effects of acute chromium supplementation on postprandial metabolism in healthy young men. J Am Coll Nutr 2004;23:351-7.</p>
<p>Komorowski JR, Greenberg D, Juturu V. Chromium picolinate does not produce chromosome damage. Toxicology in Vitro 2008;22:819-26.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/only-one-chromium-supplement-helps-people-with-diabetes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nature’s Candida Cure: Coconut Oil Solves Yeast Problems</title>
		<link>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/nature%e2%80%99s-candida-cure-coconut-oil-solves-yeast-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/nature%e2%80%99s-candida-cure-coconut-oil-solves-yeast-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Candida/Fungus/Yeast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Coconut Oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leifgrunseth.com/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuesday, December 30, 2008 by: Elizabeth Walling, citizen journalist
Often mis-diagnosed and even dismissed, candida is culprit behind numerous health problems. The symptoms associated with candida include fatigue, poor memory, mood swings, chronic coughs, frequent sinus infections, reoccurring fungal infections, blurred vision, sugar cravings and abdominal pain, to name a few.
As many as 40 million people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tuesday, December 30, 2008 by: Elizabeth Walling, citizen journalist</p>
<p>Often mis-diagnosed and even dismissed, candida is culprit behind numerous health problems. The symptoms associated with candida include fatigue, poor memory, mood swings, chronic coughs, frequent sinus infections, reoccurring fungal infections, blurred vision, sugar cravings and abdominal pain, to name a few.</p>
<p>As many as 40 million people in the United States suffer from candida, most without realizing the core issue. Many people who have candida overgrowth will end up treating the symptoms instead of the root of the problem, causing an endless spiral downward, sometimes for many years.</p>
<p>Even those who realize their symptoms are linked to <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/candida.html">candida</a> find conventional drugs are not a permanent or effective solution. Not to mention medical treatments are often accompanied by side effects worse than the original symptoms. It&#8217;s no wonder candida patients are seeking an alternative natural treatment. And fortunately, <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/coconut_oil.html">coconut oil</a> can provide the answer.<span id="more-568"></span></p>
<p>In countries where coconuts are regularly consumed, candida occurrences are surprisingly low, as noted by Dr. Bruce Fife, a strong believer in the healing power of coconut oil. Although many people in these regions live in conditions that typically promote candida overgrowth, they rarely suffer from candida.</p>
<p>This is because coconut oil is high in both lauric acid and caprylic acid, which both have antiviral, antimicrobial and antifungal properties. These components of coconut oil target harmful <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/bacteria.html">bacteria</a> but leave friendly bacteria alone, which helps balances the flora in the digestive system. They also kill off excess yeast and other fungal overgrowth in the body. Studies in Iceland and Nigeria show coconut oil is an effective agent for killing off candida yeast.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve heard conflicting reports and are concerned about whether or not coconut oil is healthy, keep in mind the natural, unrefined fats in coconut oil are medium-chain saturated fats-the kind that are more easily converted into energy instead of being stored. Adding a moderate amount of coconut oil to your diet should be considered safe. In fact, the saturated fat content in coconut oil makes it an excellent choice for <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/cooking.html">cooking</a>, because the oil is not damaged at high temperatures like other cooking oils.</p>
<p>Be sure not to buy coconut oil that has been hydrogenated. This destroys the beneficial attributes of coconut oil and makes it high in dangerous trans-fatty acids. The best kind of coconut oil is organic virgin coconut oil, which is closest to its natural state and will provide the most <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/health.html">health</a> benefits.</p>
<p>Both Dr. William G. Crook and Dr. Bruce Fife suggest working up to consuming about three tablespoons of coconut oil daily. It&#8217;s best to start with one teaspoon per day and then work up to the full amount. The more severe the candida, the slower you should work up to this number to prevent overwhelming die-off symptoms as excess yeast is killed off. These symptoms are flu-like and include headaches, chills and fatigue. They will normally last about 3-5 days, depending on the severity of your candida.</p>
<p>Adding coconut oil to your diet is not difficult to do. Depending on the brand you buy, coconut oil has a very light flavor suitable for almost any purpose. You can easily substitute coconut oil for butter on toast or cooking oil in recipes. Try adding a tablespoon to coffee, or stir some into your oatmeal.</p>
<p>You can use coconut oil topically if you have a breakout of athlete&#8217;s foot or yeast rash. Coconut oil can also be used for localized treatment of jock itch and yeast <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/infections.html">infections</a>. For any topical treatment, apply a small amount of coconut oil to the affected area 3-4 times each day. This treatment is most effective if you are also taking the oil internally.</p>
<p><em>Bredel, Matthew. (2008) Coconut Oil: Candida Cure.</p>
<p>Crook, William G. (1986) The Yeast Connection, Vintage Books.</p>
<p>Fife, Bruce. (2005) Coconut Cures: Preventing and Treating Common Health Problems with Coconut. Piccadilly Books.</em></p>
<p><em> </em><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/025199.html">http://www.naturalnews.com/025199.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/nature%e2%80%99s-candida-cure-coconut-oil-solves-yeast-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genes Don&#8217;t Cause Cancer: Exhaustive Study Reveals Genetic Links to be Hogwash</title>
		<link>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/565/</link>
		<comments>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/565/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leifgrunseth.com/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, December 30, 2008
Key concepts: Genes, Cancer and Medical myths
It&#8217;s a clever line parroted by cancer docs everywhere: Your genes cause cancer, so you&#8217;d better get your breasts surgically removed just in case, you know, so you don&#8217;t ever get cancer.
But as it turns out, the whole genetic link to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, December 30, 2008<br />
Key concepts: <a title="More Articles About Genes" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/genes.html">Genes</a>, <a title="More Articles About Cancer" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/cancer.html">Cancer</a> and <a title="More Articles About Medical myths" href="http://www.naturalnews.com/medical_myths.html">Medical myths</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a clever line parroted by cancer docs everywhere: Your genes cause cancer, so you&#8217;d better get your breasts surgically removed just in case, you know, so you don&#8217;t ever get cancer.</p>
<p>But as it turns out, the whole genetic link to cancer is 99% hogwash. A study completed at the Ioannina School of Medicine in Greece analyzed hundreds of other studies that claimed to have &#8220;discovered&#8221; genes that cause cancer, and it found that out of 240 claimed associations between genes and cancer risk, only two genes actually had any significant correlation at all. (That&#8217;s less than one percent, if you&#8217;re keeping track.)</p>
<p>Put another way, over 99% of the claims about genes causing cancer don&#8217;t hold up to scientific scrutiny.<span id="more-565"></span></p>
<p>So what are they, then? <strong>Scare tactics</strong>, of course. By blaming genes for disease, doctors can disempower patients and convince them that they have no control over their own health. It also diminishes the importance of avoiding smoking, boosting vitamin D consumption, increasing exercise and engaging in other smart lifestyle improvements that directly reduce cancer risk. When people are convinced they&#8217;re going to get cancer anyway (&#8221;It&#8217;s in your genes!&#8221;), they tend to stop taking care of their health, giving in to the deterministic brainwashing that&#8217;s been fed to them by the profit-driven cancer industry.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no surprise, of course, that real science shows the cancer gene claims to be 99% junk science. The cancer industry has never been interested in real science anyway: It&#8217;s run almost entirely on the quest for corporate profits and the ongoing use of fear mongering tactics such as scaring women into submitting to chemotherapy by using mammography equipment that routinely produces false positives.</p>
<p>Even the whole cancer screening process is actually part of the cancer <em>recruiting</em> scam: Since mammograms emit cancer-causing radiation, a woman who undergoes mammography on a regular basis inevitably ends up with cancer tumors that were caused by the mammograms! Thus, the very process of <strong>screening for cancer causes cancer!</strong></p>
<p>And then, when they find a tumor in your breast, they claim, &#8220;There&#8217;s nothing you could have done about it. You had the gene for breast cancer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nonsense. Pure quackery. Criminal quackery, even.</p>
<p>The truth is that <strong>you can be free of cancer regardless of your genetic code</strong>, because it is the <em>expression</em> of those genes that matters. And guess what controls the expression of your genes? Your nutrition, diet, lifestyle choices and avoidance of cancer-causing chemicals in foods, drugs, cosmetics and personal care products.</p>
<p>In other words, you have probably 99% control over whether you get cancer or not. But the corrupt cancer industry wants you to think you actually have zero control.</p>
<p>What a con.</p>
<p> <strong>Related Articles:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/021175.html">The discovery of DNA variability, holographic blueprints and the symphony of life</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/024284.html">HealthBookSummaries.com Releases Downloadable Summary of The Genie In Your Genes by Dawson Church</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/024133.html">New Study Indicates DNA Can Be Altered Through Diet and Exercise</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/020024.html">Search for cancer genes unlikely to succeed, say researchers (press release)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/024131.html">Schizophrenia Not Caused by Genes, Scientist Says</a></li>
</ul>
<p>http://www.naturalnews.com/News_000641_genes_cancer_medical_myths.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/565/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dishonesty Behind Mandatory Flu Vaccinations</title>
		<link>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/the-dishonesty-behind-mandatory-flu-vaccinations/</link>
		<comments>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/the-dishonesty-behind-mandatory-flu-vaccinations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Colds/Flu]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Greed]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Drug Companies and Drugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal Toxicity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vaccinations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leifgrunseth.com/?p=563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Alaska Employees Get Vaccine Ultimatum



Dr. Joseph Mercola
Source: http://www.mercola.com
January 1, 2009



Employees at Providence Alaska Medical Center no longer have a choice as to whether or not they receive a flu vaccine. The hospital is requiring all employees to get flu shots by year&#8217;s end or face dismissal.  The new policy is controversial, especially among nurses. Many [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p align="center"><strong>Alaska</strong><strong> Employees Get Vaccine Ultimatum</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dr. Joseph Mercola<br />
Source:<a href="http://www.mercola.com/" target="_blank"><strong> http://www.mercola.com</strong></a><br />
January 1, 2009</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Employees at Providence Alaska Medical Center no longer have a choice as to whether or not they receive a flu vaccine. The hospital is requiring all employees to get flu shots by year&#8217;s end or face dismissal.  The new policy is controversial, especially among nurses. Many nurses don&#8217;t want to be forced to get a shot that carries health risks of its own and doesn&#8217;t always work, according to the nurses&#8217; union.</p>
<p>Nationally, fewer than half of health care workers receive flu vaccines. Before this year at Providence, about 40 percent of employees were vaccinated.  The nurses&#8217; union has filed a grievance protesting the policy.<span id="more-563"></span></p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><a href="http://www.aksuperstation.com/news/35816369.html?s=kimo" target="_blank"><strong>ABC Alaska News December 9, 2008</strong></a></li>
</ul>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom"><a name="drcomment"><strong>Dr. Mercola&#8217;s Comments:</strong></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Conspicuously absent from this article is any discussion of how many patients are actually infected with the flu each year during a hospital stay.When a hospital mandates a <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/07/17/u-s-government-ignores-flu-vaccine-death.aspx"><strong>dangerous vaccine</strong></a> as a condition of employment, shouldn&#8217;t administrators at least soften the blow with statistics that point to an expected reduction in patient infection rates?</p>
<p>The truth is there are no such statistics, because:</p>
<ul>
<li>1. the majority of health care workers do not get a flu shot, and</li>
<li>2. there are very few documented cases of flu outbreaks caused by health care workers</li>
</ul>
<p>Are <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/11/06/mandatory-flu-shots-for-preschoolers-cause-outrage.aspx"><strong>mandatory flu vaccinations</strong></a> becoming a trend?</p>
<p>If so why?</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s the benefit - and for whom?</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s Behind the Strong Arm Tactics?</strong></p>
<p>In a single word, <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/10/23/flu-crimes.aspx"><strong>money</strong></a>.</p>
<p>The CDC&#8217;s well-orchestrated <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/09/15/flu-season.aspx"><strong>annual campaign</strong></a> to frighten you into getting vaccinated against the influenza virus isn&#8217;t the resounding success they hoped for.</p>
<p>Is it just a coincidence news reports about mandated vaccine programs are starting to pop up? Is it possible the vaccine manufacturers and other financially interested parties think there&#8217;s too much money being left on the table?</p>
<p>What other explanation could there be when institutions like hospitals and schools begin issuing ultimatums to get vaccinated or get out?</p>
<p>The flu vaccine has not only proved ineffective, it also contains highly toxic substances that can be very dangerous to your health and the health of your family.</p>
<p><strong>A Few Facts About Flu Shots</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/10/09/controversial-findings-about-flu-vaccines-for-the-elderly.aspx"><strong>Vaccinations do not protect the elderly</strong></a>.</p>
<p>There is no conclusive proof that the flu vaccine prevents flu-related deaths among the elderly, despite the fact that 75 percent of flu-related deaths occur in that age group. Flu shots are thought to be less effective in older people due to lowered immune activity.</p>
<p><a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/03/15/why-do-drugmakers-still-defend-the-use-of-mercury-in-their-vaccines.aspx"><strong>Most flu vaccines contain dangerous levels of mercury.</strong></a></p>
<p>The CDC recommends that pregnant women, infants and children receive flu vaccines containing thimerosal. Thimerosal contains almost 50 percent ethyl mercury by weight, and is highly toxic.</p>
<p>The CDC&#8217;s recommendation is reckless, especially since the Institute of Medicine has warned that these specific demographic groups should <em>not</em> be injected with thimerosal. Most flu vaccines contain 25 micrograms of mercury, <em>an amount unsafe for anyone weighing less than 550 pounds.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2005/05/31/universal-flu-vaccine-part-two.aspx"><strong>Mercury isn&#8217;t the only toxic substance found in flu vaccines.</strong></a></p>
<p>Fillers commonly used in the manufacture of flu vaccines include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Ethylene glycol (antifreeze)</li>
<li>Phenol (carbolic acid)</li>
<li>Formaldehyde - a known cancer causing agent</li>
<li>Aluminum - a neurotoxin linked to Alzheimer&#8217;s disease</li>
<li>Neomycin and streptomycin (antibiotics)</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/10/30/flu-deaths.aspx"><strong>Flu-related deaths are rare.</strong></a></p>
<p>As part of the CDC&#8217;s campaign to promote flu vaccines, it employs the use of a slippery statistic regarding flu-related deaths. Lumped together in this statistic are deaths from flu <em>and</em> deaths from pneumonia. Actual flu deaths are a very small percentage of the total deaths in this category.</p>
<p>Pneumonia, which is not the same illness as influenza, is responsible for the vast majority of deaths the CDC would have you believe are flu-related.</p>
<p><strong>How to Protect Yourself from the Flu</strong></p>
<p>There is growing evidence that if you come down with the flu, you could be vitamin D deficient. The flu is primarily an illness of winter, when there are fewer hours of sunshine, and your exposure to the sun is often very limited.</p>
<p>It works like this. Vitamin D supports your immune system. If your vitamin D level is too low, your immune system has a reduced ability to fight bacteria and viruses. That circumstance can result in a &#8220;flu bug&#8221; taking you over.</p>
<p>One of the first things you should do to protect yourself from the flu virus is to <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/08/24/lack-of-sunshine-causes-600-000-cancers-a-year.aspx"><strong>optimize your vitamin D levels.</strong></a></p>
<p>Other important ways to stay healthy during the winter months (and year round):</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li> Eat right for your <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/02/26/metabolic-typing-part-three.aspx"><strong>nutritional type</strong></a></li>
<li> <a href="http://www.mercola.com/article/insulin.htm"><strong>Eliminate sugar</strong></a> from your diet</li>
<li> Eat <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/02/28/garlic-health.aspx"><strong>garlic</strong></a> regularly</li>
<li> Consume a <a href="http://products.mercola.com/krill/"><strong>high-quality krill oil</strong></a> daily</li>
<li> <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/10/30/flu-vaccine-part-eleven.aspx"><strong>Exercise</strong></a> </li>
<li> Get adequate <a href="http://www.mercola.com/article/sleep.htm"><strong>sleep</strong></a></li>
<li> <a href="http://www.mercola.com/forms/eftcourse1.htm"><strong>Address emotional stress</strong></a> </li>
<li> <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/09/25/flu-hygiene.aspx"><strong>Wash your hands regularly</strong></a> (but not excessively)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>If You Already Have the Flu &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>You can also use vitamin D to treat your symptoms. It is best to <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/10/21/avoid-flu-shots-vitamin-d-is-a-better-way.aspx"><strong>read the entire article and view the videos</strong></a>, but the general recommendation is to take 2,000 units per kilogram of body weight (one pound = 0.45 kg), once daily for three days.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Related Articles:</strong></p>
<p>  <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2006/11/23/flu-vaccines-offer-no-protection-for-the-elderly.aspx"><strong>Flu Vaccines Offer No Protection for the Elderly</strong></a></p>
<p> <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2006/11/16/medical-experts-exaggerate-the-benefits-of-harmful-flu-vaccines.aspx"><strong>Medical Experts Exaggerate the Benefits of Harmful Flu Vaccines</strong></a></p>
<p> <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/12/13/flu-vaccine.aspx"><strong>Alternatives to the Flu Vaccine</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leifgrunseth.com/2009/01/the-dishonesty-behind-mandatory-flu-vaccinations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vaccinations - Do You Know the Facts and Implications?</title>
		<link>http://leifgrunseth.com/2008/12/vacinnations-do-you-really-know-the-facts-and-implications/</link>
		<comments>http://leifgrunseth.com/2008/12/vacinnations-do-you-really-know-the-facts-and-implications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Baby/Children's Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vaccinations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leifgrunseth.com/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think you know about vaccinations, watch this informative and intelligent 45 minute video and be informed about the issues.  If you have kids or are pregnant, the vaccination question is one of the more impacting and important decisions you can ever make for their health.  Every parent has to decide at some point to do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think you know about vaccinations, watch this informative and intelligent 45 minute video and be informed about the issues.  If you have kids or are pregnant, the vaccination question is one of the more impacting and important decisions you can ever make for their health.  Every parent has to decide at some point to do it or not, and knowing the facts will make your decision much more easy.  Don&#8217;t procrastinate - just watch it!</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/11/11/some-parents-are-home-schooling-their-kids-to-avoid-vaccinations.aspx">http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/11/11/some-parents-are-home-schooling-their-kids-to-avoid-vaccinations.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leifgrunseth.com/2008/12/vacinnations-do-you-really-know-the-facts-and-implications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fend off Psoriasis and Eczema with Simple, Inexpensive Remedies</title>
		<link>http://leifgrunseth.com/2008/12/fend-off-psoriasis-and-eczema-with-simple-inexpensive-remedies/</link>
		<comments>http://leifgrunseth.com/2008/12/fend-off-psoriasis-and-eczema-with-simple-inexpensive-remedies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Allergies and Asthma]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Skin Conditions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leifgrunseth.com/?p=556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Eczema (atopic dermatitis), and the closely associated psoriasis, are two very common skin problems.  Both eczema and psoriasis are potentially allergic conditions that can be triggered by environmental factors and dozens of other external irritants like:

Laundry detergent
Soaps
Household chemicals
Workplace chemicals
Perfumes
Animal dander
Metals (such as nickel in jewelry)

While psoriasis is most often linked with external allergic triggers, eczema [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Eczema (atopic dermatitis), and the closely associated psoriasis, are two very common skin problems.  Both eczema and psoriasis are potentially allergic conditions that can be triggered by environmental factors and dozens of other external irritants like:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Laundry detergent</li>
<li>Soaps</li>
<li>Household chemicals</li>
<li>Workplace chemicals</li>
<li>Perfumes</li>
<li>Animal dander</li>
<li>Metals (such as nickel in jewelry)</li>
</ul>
<p>While psoriasis is most often linked with external allergic triggers, eczema is often caused by food allergies. However, although they&#8217;re different diseases and have varying triggers, their treatments have many commonalities. .</p>
<p><strong>How to Effectively and Inexpensively Treat Eczema and Psoriasis<span id="more-556"></span></strong></p>
<p>Eczema is &#8220;the itch that rashes,&#8221; meaning, there&#8217;s really no rash until you start scratching the itchy area. Hence, the first thing you need to do is to <em>stop scratching!</em></p>
<p><strong>Addressing the itch</strong> &#8212; As anyone with eczema will attest, this is easier said than done. But fortunately, there IS a really simple, inexpensive way to relieve the itch: Simply put a saltwater compress over the itchy area.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll want to use a high quality natural salt, such as Himalayan salt. Simply make a solution with warm water, soak a compress, and apply the compress over the affected area. You&#8217;ll be amazed to find that the itching will virtually disappear!</p>
<p>Another method that can be helpful for reducing or stopping the itch is <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2005/12/31/impressive-relief-for-skin-disorders.aspx">EFT</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Proper skin hydration</strong> - When working with any type of skin condition, you need to make sure your skin is optimally hydrated. Skin creams are rarely the answer here, but rather you&#8217;ll want to hydrate your skin from the inside out by consuming high quality, animal-based omega-3 fats in your diet.</p>
<p>Your best sources for omega-3s are animal-based fats like <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/08/14/is-krill-oil-48-times-better-than-fish-oil.aspx">krill oil or fish oil</a>. I also find it helpful to include a bit of gamma linoleic acid, typically in the form of primrose oil, as this works remarkably well for eczema.  Products like &#8220;krill for women&#8221; are good for both sexes for this condition as they have both fatty acids.</p>
<p>Plant-based omega-3s like flax and hemp seed, although decent omega-3 sources in general, will not provide <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/01/01/fish-oil-part-thirteen.aspx">the clinical benefit you need to reduce inflammation</a> and swelling in your skin.</p>
<p>Secondly, you&#8217;ll want to reduce your exposure to harsh soaps and drying out your skin with excessive bathing. Use a very mild soap when you cleanse your skin, especially in the winter to avoid stripping your skin of moisture.</p>
<p><strong>Taking care of your gut = Taking care of your skin</strong> - Many don&#8217;t realize this, but the health and quality of your skin is strongly linked to the health of your gut. I recommend taking a high quality probiotic to ensure optimal digestive health. Fermented foods can be used as well, but are neither as common nor as easy to use.</p>
<p><strong>Diet and skin quality</strong> - Food allergies play an enormous role in eczema. In my experience, the most common offending agent is wheat, or more specifically, gluten. Avoiding wheat and other gluten-containing grains is therefore a wise first step.</p>
<p>If you were to visit <a href="http://naturalhealthcenter.mercola.com/">my clinic outside of Chicago</a> as a new patient, one of the first steps we would advise would be to go on a gluten-free diet for a number of weeks and carefully observe any health improvements.  This is an enormously common problem and many of our patients are surprised to find how much improvement they actually achieve from this step.</p>
<p>Avoiding grains will also reduce the amount of sugar in your system, which will normalize your insulin levels and reduce any and all inflammatory conditions you may have, including inflammation in your skin.</p>
<p>Other common allergens include milk and eggs. I recommend you do an elimination trial with these foods as well. You should see some improvement in about a week, sometimes less, after eliminating them from your diet if either of them is causing you trouble.</p>
<p><strong>Basking in the sun</strong> - Vitamin D in the form of sun exposure is your best friend when dealing with either of these skin conditions, but it&#8217;s especially helpful for psoriasis.</p>
<p>I produced a <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/12/16/my-one-hour-vitamin-d-lecture-to-clear-up-all-your-confusion-on-this-vital-nutrient.aspx">one-hour lecture</a> that explains the health benefits of this long under-appreciated vitamin, so if you haven&#8217;t seen it already, I strongly recommend you take the time to <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/12/16/my-one-hour-vitamin-d-lecture-to-clear-up-all-your-confusion-on-this-vital-nutrient.aspx">watch this free video</a> now.</p>
<p>Ideally, you&#8217;ll want to get your vitamin D from appropriate sunshine exposure because UVB radiation on your skin will not only metabolize vitamin D, but will also help restore ideal skin function. High amounts of UVB exposure directly on affected skin - but not so much to cause sunburn! - will greatly improve the quality of your skin.</p>
<p>However, if you can&#8217;t get sufficient amounts of sun during the winter months, a high quality safe tanning bed can suffice. A safe tanning bed will provide the optimized forms of UVA and UVB wavelengths, without dangerous magnetic skin balance.</p>
<p><strong>Why Conventional Treatments Fail</strong></p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to use expensive, dangerous medicines to treat eczema or psoriasis!</p>
<p>Steroid creams especially, are clearly something you&#8217;ll want to avoid, because although they work initially, you will tend to rapidly develop tolerance to them. These creams contain synthetic steroids, which are absorbed into your skin, and can wreak serious havoc with your adrenal system.</p>
<p>So please, avoid steroid creams and other potentially dangerous medications for these skin conditions and use these natural methods instead. You&#8217;ll find they work almost all the time, especially if you diligently apply them.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Related Articles:</strong></p>
<p>  <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/12/01/ease-that-itch.aspx">Ease That Itch - Causes and Characteristics of Psoriasis and Eczema</a></p>
<p> <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/07/07/eczema-part-one.aspx">Sunlight For Eczema (Atopic Dermatitis)</a></p>
<p> <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2005/12/31/impressive-relief-for-skin-disorders.aspx">Impressive Relief for Skin Disorders</a></p>
<p><a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/12/30/fend-off-psoriasis-and-eczema-with-simple-inexpensive-remedies.aspx">http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/12/30/fend-off-psoriasis-and-eczema-with-simple-inexpensive-remedies.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leifgrunseth.com/2008/12/fend-off-psoriasis-and-eczema-with-simple-inexpensive-remedies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lithium Increases White Cell Numbers</title>
		<link>http://leifgrunseth.com/2008/12/lithium-increases-white-cell-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://leifgrunseth.com/2008/12/lithium-increases-white-cell-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 05:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy and Radiation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vitamins/Minerals/Nutrients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leifgrunseth.com/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q: My sister was diagnosed with cancer several months ago and the chemotherapy has destroyed her white blood cell count. I know how important it is for her to build it back up, and was wondering if you have any information on natural ways to do that?
Dr. Wright: Keeping a normal white blood cell count is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q: My sister was diagnosed with cancer several months ago and the chemotherapy has destroyed her white blood cell count. I know how important it is for her to build it back up, and was wondering if you have any information on natural ways to do that?</p>
<p>Dr. Wright: Keeping a normal white blood cell count is one of the very basic necessities for good health. Your body uses white blood cells to fight off viruses, bacteria, and all sorts of potentially harmful foreign invaders. If your levels fall, you&#8217;re much more prone to illness. Chemotherapy and radiation are probably the most well-known offenders causing low white cell counts, but levels can fall for any number of reasons. But researchers have found that lihium can increase white cell numbers again in people whose levels fell due to radiation and/or chemotherapy (and even if the person continues those treatments).</p>
<p>Lithium achieves these effects by stimulating the stem cells in bone marrow, which then turn into platelets and white blood cells. I&#8217;ve observed that low dose lithium (5-10 milligrams twice daily) will also usually raise a low count to normal even if radiation and chemotherapy aren&#8217;t the culprits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leifgrunseth.com/2008/12/lithium-increases-white-cell-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
