Breast Cancer Prevention’s Dirty Little Secret …
If you haven’t yet done so you can claim your FREE REPORT right now that details why conventional medicine stubbornly clings to out-dated ideas of breast cancer detection — despite the fact that the health hazards of mammograms have been reliably demonstrated. Plus, get the scoop on a safer, non-invasive alternative.
Your doctor isn’t telling you about this painless and non-invasive breast cancer screening test that’s been shown to prevent cancer, not just find it. Instead, your doctor probably advises you to undergo mammograms, despite their known health hazards..
While mammograms are highly touted to screen for breast cancer, there is no solid evidence that they save lives. Plus, they expose you to 1,000 times more radiation than you’d get from a chest x-ray. There is no solid evidence that mammograms save lives. In fact, research demonstrates that adding an annual mammogram to a careful physical examination of the breasts does not improve breast cancer survival rates over getting the examination alone.
Yet, most physicians continue to recommend mammograms for fear of being sued by a woman who develops breast cancer after which he did not advise her to get one. But I encourage you to think for yourself and consider safer, more effective alternatives to mammograms.
The option for breast screening that I most highly recommend is called thermography.Thermographic breast screening is brilliantly simple. It measures the radiation of infrared heat from your body and translates this information into anatomical images. Your normal blood circulation is under the control of your autonomic nervous system, which governs your body functions.
Thermography uses no mechanical pressure or ionizing radiation, and can detect signs of breast cancer years earlier than either mammography or a physical exam.
Mammography cannot detect a tumor until after it has been growing for years and reaches a certain size. Thermography is able to detect the possibility of breast cancer much earlier, because it can image the early stages of angiogenesis (the formation of a direct supply of blood to cancer cells, which is a necessary step before they can grow into tumors of size).
To find out everything you need to know about the risks of conventional breast cancer screening (mammograms) and the benefits of thermography, please take a few minutes to read this exclusive, FREE report: The Safe Breast Cancer Screening Test Your Doctor Isn’t Telling You About.
Visit Dr. Mercola’s Thermography Diagnostics Center NOW
Related Articles:
Major Confusion on How to Do Breast Checks
When Will the Insanity of Mammogram Recommendations End?
Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?
ThomasT
The other dirty little secret is that mammograms actually cause 52% of breast cancers. The fact that, The Cure and Prevention of All Cancers, 2007, H R Clark, PhD ND is today available to you, is another little secret. In its 668 pages you will learn the causes and pathways of all cancers, which have been positively identified by resonance comparison. That means that the easy, quick, cost effective, side effect free CURE and prevention are now ours. The usual snake oil, false hope and junk science labels from the oncologist are not acceptable.
Kelley Eidem
That book has been around for a while, yet a business associate just recommended it to me three days ago! He wasn’t the first to recommend it to me.
As for cancer screening tests, there is also the “HCG Urine Immunoassay.”
The sophisticated test was developed by a Philippine Dr. Manuel D. Navarro in the late 1950’s! His son, Dr. Efren Navarro, continues to analyze the test results in Palentine, IL.
This HCG test can find cancer 12 to 27 months before other kinds of testing depending on the type of cancer. It finds any cancer anywhere in the body, not just the breast, and is 97% accurate.
The downside is that it takes six weeks for results. So it’s best used to screen a healthy person.
One more thing. When a person has cancer it’s critically important to which supplements will shrink your tumors and which ones will accelerate its growth.
Two women, say ‘Mary’ and ‘Tina,’ could have the same breast cancer…or other cancer… but the same supplement will help shrink the Mary’s tumors but grow Tina’s.
To avoid that mistake, I’ve listed which ones are which:
hubpages.com/…/Cancer-Cautionthis-supplement-can-SHRINK-or-SPREAD-your-cancer
The best to you.
Kelley Eidem Together we can cure cancer - one person at a time!
DLARAH
Breast cancer, according to Dr. Hamer’s emperical findings is caused by a ‘biological worry conflict’ experienced by the female’s psyche. A DHS (Dirk Hamer Syndrom), verifyable through a CT scan of the brain, will confirm this fact. Once this Significant Biological Special program of Nature is active, additional (temporary) cells are commanded to grow in the breast. For a right handed woman, the left breast is effected, if her child or her mother is the subject of this conflict. The right breast of a right handed woman is effected if the subject is her partner or any other member of her ‘clan’. The situation is reverse for a left handed female. The fact, that temporary type cells are being used to grow, tells us, that this very same program also has the healing, the taking down of the tumour build into it, once the ‘conflict’ has been resolved. Please check this out here: germannewmedicine.ca/…/intrognm.html .
Click on any SBS of your choosing to inform yourselves of this momentous discovery of the causes and the CURES of all diseases by Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer. Unfortunately, his own very extensive website is in the German language and the translation into English is an ongoing labour of love and still incomplete. However, for people with German language skills, here is the URL:
Peace and Prosperity to the seekers of this precious knowledge!
Mama Doc
You absolutely CANNOT say that the cause of a cancer is any one particular thing. It is MULTIFACTORIAL, including genes, environment, immune health, etc, etc,etc. I’m interested about the quality of the study in which you obtained this “fact” (re: 52% of breast cancers).
One of my favourite sayings: ”Precisely 86.3% of all stated statistics are based on error”.
flbooks7
I went to the doctor last week and he was quite annoyed when I told him my opinion about mammograms. I have been anemic for about 9 years…2 of those I have been going to that particular clinic. I got tired of it and read one of Jonathan Wright’s book…followed his instructions..straightened me out in one month…that annoyed him too.
|
|
CCurtis
I’ve been anemic for 10 years now (autoimmune hemolytic anemia) thanks to doctors who gave me antibiotics like candy when I was young for colds and acne. Due to the antibiotics, I got colitis, then the anemia from the colitis medicine (and also possibly enhanced by the MMR vaccine I was forced to get when I entered college at 35 after many years out of school). I’ve been on prednisone for 9 of those years still trying to reduce the dosage. I ultimately relapse when I get to 3-5 mg. and have to increase the meds to stabilize again (I’m now back to 6 mg). What type of anemia do you have? What is the book? Maybe it might help me as well. My docs also hate it when I tell them about all of my alternative treatments I’ve tried. I’m just trying to find out why I can’t get lower than 3-5 mg. without relapsing.
voiceguy This response is for CCurtis. I, too, have been taking prednisone for many years due to an autoimmune process. Thankfully the illness has been quiescent for a very long time, but I still take 5mg. of pred. In answer to your question, after years of prednisone use your body really becomes dependent upon it. Prednisone is truly a wonder drug, but it is not without it’s downside. Your adrenal glands become suppressed because they’ve had part of their function preempted by taking this synthetic cortisol for so long. Your body NEEDS cortisol to function; the six mgs. pretty much takes you up to your base level. Your doctor knows this but he apparently hasn’t explained it.
Taking this minimal dose shouldn’t worry you as long as you eat properly and if at all possible, exercise regularly. This is key…the only way you will maintain (or reclaim) your weight, bone density, blood pressure and your good looks. I know this may be hard to do, but it is worth it.
OnlyTruth
I am 58 and have never had a mammogram - don’t trust them.
Every year when I go in for my check up my Ob/Gyn says, ” I know what you’re going to say but I have to encourage you to get a mammogram..yada yada yada.” I am a wee bit cautious about a few things. My grandmother, mother, and 3 aunts all had ovarian cancer, so….
I was just recently informed about thermography and wonder if there have been any studies attesting to its effectiveness or lack thereof.
Aaltrude
Only Truth - This article should interest you.
www.eurekalert.org/…/uomh-gco033106.php
OnlyTruth
Thank you Aaltrude, that is excellent information. I immediately sent it to a friend who is undergoing chemo for 3rd stage Ovarian cancer. I have had her juicing and watching her diet, etc. and she’s doing very well.
If it were me, I would not do the chemo. There are a number of other options I would try first, but we each have to make those decisions for ourselves.
fitbrit7
Apart from the radiation health risks, the biggest reason to be concerned about mammography is that is totally ineffective for younger women with dense breast tissue. Sadly I learnt this when my then, 32yr old girlfriend, was diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer at the age of 32. A golf-ball sized tumor was totally invisible when subjected to a mammogram on 3 seperate occasions, although with pressure it was clearly able to be felt by hand.
We were living in San Diego at the time and quickly realized that traditional treatment offered her less than a year to live. With many radical alternative treatments Darline lived with the disease for nearly 5 years before finally losing an incredibly brave battle in 2003.
Had she been receiving thermographic screening from an early age I know she would still be here today.
Now re-married, my new wife goes every year for thermographic screening, which is becoming more available closer to our home in the Florida Panhandle every year she needs to be tested. Please get tested and share the information with your friends and family!
visioneer29
There is a certain gallows humor in radiography. The quote I remember is “We keep X-raying the breasts until we find the cancer the X-rays caused.” This happened to my mother. She had all the risk factors (over 75, Jewish, college educated, large, fatty breasts) and her MD had her getting THREE mammograms a year, until (of course) she got breast cancer. Of course, it wasn’t just the X-rays. Her diet was extremely high in dairy, eggs (don’t eat lots of reproductive tissue unless you’d like a reproductive cancer!), meat, etc. She ate veggies, but not enough of them, and drank decaf coffee (it’s not the caffeine, it’s the acidity). When I found a breast lump at 30, I got a “prescription” from an MD for a mammogram. I got as far as the (painful) plates squeezing my breast, then woke up & told them to let me out of there. The tech said “wait, this is what you need,” I said “NO. It’s my body and my money, and I’m getting out of here!” That’s just what I did. I quit coffee forever, added more raw greens to my diet, & got to the emotional truth of the cause of the lump (it disappeared & never came back). If you live where you don’t have access to thermography, go to thermography.com; there’s a directory of practitioners by the doctor who interprets the results (sorry, can’t recall his name). Health and peace, everyone, Zyxomma
Mariglianese
Has Dr. Mercola heard about Tullio Simoncini or read his book Cancer as a fungus ?
Jeanie
I had thermography when I discovered a lump in my breast last year. I drastically changed my lifestyle and worked on it nutritionally for a few months, and then decided to have it surgically removed. It wasn’t getting bigger, but I knew I was expending tremendous body energy fighting that growth. I chose my surgeon, then learned that hospital protocol REQUIRED a mammogram. So I jumped through all their hoops to get the surgery. There was no cancer in the sentinel node! :-) The surgeon was 99.9% sure that he got it all, but he still recommended radiation and chemo (just to be sure!) because he is REQUIRED to do so (to avoid any lawsuits)! I said ‘no thanks’ and have continued all the life-style and nutritional adjustments to ensure that cancer cells are starved while healthy ones are fed. Thank you Dr. Mercola for all you do to give us correct info about how to get and stay healthy!
BTW: The thermography test is only $150 in Eugene OR. How much grief and money would that save you in the long run? (Maybe even in the short!)
loralei67
about time thermography has been written about! I’ve been telling people for the past year or so about this, since I first heard of it. I had it done a couple months ago & it’s so easy. I’m glad to have a really good alternative to a mammogram, especially as I probably would never had had one done. The only insurance policy I’ve seen that covers this procedure is Afflac’s supplemental cancer policy. For people wondering about its effectiveness, it can pick up cancer cells at about 8000 cells, a mammogram catches cancer at around 2 billion cells, if my memory serves me right. Not only can it detect cancer, it is the only thing that can prove that fibromyalgia is not just in someone’s head. It picks up inflammation anywhere in the body. google thermography or thermography for breast cancer & you should be able to find clinics around the country & world that provide this service.
Jbell
For anyone who has any interest in preventing and/or erradicating reproductive cancers, I would recommend looking into the work of Dr. John Lee, M.D. A few years back I found that I had prostate cancer. I used Dr. Lee’s protocols to quickly, inexpensively and painlessly get rid of the cancer. There are no side-effects from his methods, and they have a higher percentage of good outcomes than any other approach that I know of. In fact, they enhance general health while getting rid of the cancer. They apply to both men or women. Anyone interested should read his last book: “What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Breast Cancer….” I have shared this with many people who have been diagnosed with a reproductive cancer. The ones who had the courage to respond to their conventional doctors with a “No thank you!” to their coersion towards surgery, chemo, radiation, or all 3, and who instead relied on Dr. Lee’s protocols have almost all done very, very well. (A few with very late stage cancers were not able to survive, but the rest have almost all had great outcomes.)
Further, in the “developed” countries, women’s breasts are the most routinely diagnosed tissues in the human body. But if one follows Dr. Lee’s preventive methods, all that is unnecessary, as breast and other reproductive cancers become a rarity instead of common enough to be considered epidemic.
